Category talk:Brandies - Revision history

DaveGarber1975 at 05:32, 28 November 2005

2005-11-28T05:32:32Z

DaveGarber1975 at 05:32, 28 November 2005

2005-11-28T05:32:00Z

Shadowtop at 18:34, 31 October 2005

2005-10-31T18:34:51Z

Waite at 16:32, 1 May 2005

2005-05-01T16:32:30Z

PirateHero at 01:20, 30 April 2005

2005-04-30T01:20:51Z

Russianspy237: /* Brandies */

2005-04-29T23:48:13Z

Brandies

Russianspy237 at 23:08, 29 April 2005

2005-04-29T23:08:45Z

RSparkyC at 14:24, 29 April 2005

2005-04-29T14:24:53Z

RSparkyC: Brandies

2005-04-29T14:24:13Z

Brandies

Waite: looking for advice on the organization of the brandies page

2005-04-29T12:30:55Z

looking for advice on the organization of the brandies page

New page

What do you guys think, should we keep all pills, pots, wands and staves in one category, or should we split them up?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:32, 28 November 2005
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Is it really neccessary or useful to have things listed in ''Brandies'' as well as say ''Potions''? Wouldn't it be better to just have them listed once in the category which best fits them? Also, if you don't like the name ''Brandies'', it would probably be a good idea to change it now, before it gets worked into too many pages and becomes tedious to change. On the other hand, an explanation of what a ''Brandie'' is at the top of the page would be just as good, though personally I only consider ''Brandies'' to be staves. --[[User:Shadowtop\|Shadowtop]] 13:34, 31 Oct 2005 (EST)		Is it really neccessary or useful to have things listed in ''Brandies'' as well as say ''Potions''? Wouldn't it be better to just have them listed once in the category which best fits them? Also, if you don't like the name ''Brandies'', it would probably be a good idea to change it now, before it gets worked into too many pages and becomes tedious to change. On the other hand, an explanation of what a ''Brandie'' is at the top of the page would be just as good, though personally I only consider ''Brandies'' to be staves. --[[User:Shadowtop\|Shadowtop]] 13:34, 31 Oct 2005 (EST)

−	Yup, I always figured that brandies meant objects that characters can brandish, not pills and potions and whatnot. I'm all for categorizing them separately.	+	Yup, I always figured that brandies meant objects that characters can brandish, not pills and potions and whatnot. I'm all for categorizing them separately. -DaveGarber1975

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:32, 28 November 2005
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Is it really neccessary or useful to have things listed in ''Brandies'' as well as say ''Potions''? Wouldn't it be better to just have them listed once in the category which best fits them? Also, if you don't like the name ''Brandies'', it would probably be a good idea to change it now, before it gets worked into too many pages and becomes tedious to change. On the other hand, an explanation of what a ''Brandie'' is at the top of the page would be just as good, though personally I only consider ''Brandies'' to be staves. --[[User:Shadowtop\|Shadowtop]] 13:34, 31 Oct 2005 (EST)		Is it really neccessary or useful to have things listed in ''Brandies'' as well as say ''Potions''? Wouldn't it be better to just have them listed once in the category which best fits them? Also, if you don't like the name ''Brandies'', it would probably be a good idea to change it now, before it gets worked into too many pages and becomes tedious to change. On the other hand, an explanation of what a ''Brandie'' is at the top of the page would be just as good, though personally I only consider ''Brandies'' to be staves. --[[User:Shadowtop\|Shadowtop]] 13:34, 31 Oct 2005 (EST)
		+
		+	Yup, I always figured that brandies meant objects that characters can brandish, not pills and potions and whatnot. I'm all for categorizing them separately.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 31 October 2005
Line 15:		Line 15:
	If you want to make pages for items that aren't particularly useful, go for it. Put them in the "Gear In Area" category, but not in other categories like "Hero Tank Gear" or "Lowmort 11-20 Gear". That way the items will be documented but they won't be cluttering up lists where people aren't really interested in them.		If you want to make pages for items that aren't particularly useful, go for it. Put them in the "Gear In Area" category, but not in other categories like "Hero Tank Gear" or "Lowmort 11-20 Gear". That way the items will be documented but they won't be cluttering up lists where people aren't really interested in them.
	-Waite		-Waite
		+
		+	Is it really neccessary or useful to have things listed in ''Brandies'' as well as say ''Potions''? Wouldn't it be better to just have them listed once in the category which best fits them? Also, if you don't like the name ''Brandies'', it would probably be a good idea to change it now, before it gets worked into too many pages and becomes tedious to change. On the other hand, an explanation of what a ''Brandie'' is at the top of the page would be just as good, though personally I only consider ''Brandies'' to be staves. --[[User:Shadowtop\|Shadowtop]] 13:34, 31 Oct 2005 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 1 May 2005
Line 12:		Line 12:
	On a semi-related note, should we have a page for 'junk' stuff? stuff with no special attributes or useless ones (crappy AC-only gear, create spring spells, crappy gems, etc.)?<br>		On a semi-related note, should we have a page for 'junk' stuff? stuff with no special attributes or useless ones (crappy AC-only gear, create spring spells, crappy gems, etc.)?<br>
	-PirateHero		-PirateHero
		+
		+	If you want to make pages for items that aren't particularly useful, go for it. Put them in the "Gear In Area" category, but not in other categories like "Hero Tank Gear" or "Lowmort 11-20 Gear". That way the items will be documented but they won't be cluttering up lists where people aren't really interested in them.
		+	-Waite

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 30 April 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:
	i think keep them together but change the name, that way we can be more acurate and still have teh same info in one place		i think keep them together but change the name, that way we can be more acurate and still have teh same info in one place
	-elfangwor		-elfangwor
		+
		+	Seems like the idea you were going with was lots of seperate pages and categories -- that's why you have seperate area and gear in area pages. Might as well stick with that and make them all seperate.<br>
		+	On a semi-related note, should we have a page for 'junk' stuff? stuff with no special attributes or useless ones (crappy AC-only gear, create spring spells, crappy gems, etc.)?<br>
		+	-PirateHero

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 29 April 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:

	i think keep them together but change the name, that way we can be more acurate and still have teh same info in one place		i think keep them together but change the name, that way we can be more acurate and still have teh same info in one place
		+	-elfangwor

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:08, 29 April 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I would add seperate subcats for each<br>		I would add seperate subcats for each<br>
	-RSparkyC		-RSparkyC
		+
		+	i think keep them together but change the name, that way we can be more acurate and still have teh same info in one place

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:24, 29 April 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Brandies ==		== Brandies ==

−	I would add seperate subcats for each	+	I would add seperate subcats for each<br>
		+	-RSparkyC

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:24, 29 April 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What do you guys think, should we keep all pills, pots, wands and staves in one category, or should we split them up?		What do you guys think, should we keep all pills, pots, wands and staves in one category, or should we split them up?
		+
		+	== Brandies ==
		+
		+	I would add seperate subcats for each